On Mon, Mar 03, 2014 at 09:20:02PM -0600, Dinh Nguyen wrote: > Hi Paul, > > On 3/3/14 9:14 PM, Paul Zimmerman wrote: > >> From: dingu...@altera.com [mailto:dingu...@altera.com] > >> Sent: Monday, March 03, 2014 2:20 PM > >> > >> From: Dinh Nguyen <dingu...@altera.com> > >> > >> The dwc2 IP on the SOCFPGA cannot use the default HW configured > >> FIFO sizes. The total FIFO depth as read from GHWCFG3 reports 0x1f80 or > >> 8064 > >> 32-bit words. But the GRXFSIZ, GNPTXFSIZ, and HPTXFSIZ register defaults > >> to 0x2000 or 8192 32-bit words. So the driver cannot just use the fifo > >> sizes > >> as read from those registers. > >> > >> For platforms that face the same issue, this commits sets the RX, periodic > >> TX, > >> and non-periodic TX fifo size to those that are recommended v2.93a spec for > >> the DWC2 IP. > >> > >> Signed-off-by: Dinh Nguyen <dingu...@altera.com> > >> Cc: Paul Zimmerman <pa...@synopsys.com> > >> Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gre...@linuxfoundation.org> > >> --- > >> drivers/usb/dwc2/core.c | 41 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > >> 1 file changed, 41 insertions(+) > >> > >> diff --git a/drivers/usb/dwc2/core.c b/drivers/usb/dwc2/core.c > >> index 1d12988..e8e394c 100644 > >> --- a/drivers/usb/dwc2/core.c > >> +++ b/drivers/usb/dwc2/core.c > >> @@ -507,6 +507,44 @@ void dwc2_disable_host_interrupts(struct dwc2_hsotg > >> *hsotg) > >> writel(intmsk, hsotg->regs + GINTMSK); > >> } > >> > >> +/* > >> + * dwc2_calculate_dynamic_fifo() - Calculates the default fifo size > >> + * For system that have a total fifo depth that is smaller than the > >> default > >> + * RX + TX fifo size. > >> + * > >> + * @hsotg: Programming view of DWC_otg controller > >> + */ > >> +static void dwc2_calculate_dynamic_fifo(struct dwc2_hsotg *hsotg) > >> +{ > >> + struct dwc2_core_params *params = hsotg->core_params; > >> + struct dwc2_hw_params *hw = &hsotg->hw_params; > >> + u32 rxfsiz, nptxfsiz, ptxfsiz, total_fifo_size; > >> + > >> + total_fifo_size = hw->total_fifo_size; > >> + rxfsiz = params->host_rx_fifo_size; > >> + nptxfsiz = params->host_nperio_tx_fifo_size; > >> + ptxfsiz = params->host_perio_tx_fifo_size; > >> + > >> + if (total_fifo_size >= (rxfsiz + nptxfsiz + ptxfsiz)) > >> + /* Params are valid, nothing to do */ > >> + return; > >> + else { > > Kernel style says both branches of the if() statement should have > > parentheses here. (Checkpatch doesn't warn about that, I thought it > > did.) > No, checkpatch was clean.
try with --strict -- balbi
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
