Hi,

On Friday 13 December 2013 12:01 AM, Felipe Balbi wrote:
> In case pm_runtime_get*() fails, it still
> increments pm usage counter, so we *must*
> make sure to pm_runtime_put() even in those
> cases.

But shouldn't the fix be in pm_runtime_get()?

Cheers
Kishon

> 
> This patch fixes that mistake the same way
> usbcore treats those possible failures.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Felipe Balbi <ba...@ti.com>
> ---
>  drivers/phy/phy-core.c | 12 ++++++++++--
>  1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/phy/phy-core.c b/drivers/phy/phy-core.c
> index 03cf8fb..5b61123 100644
> --- a/drivers/phy/phy-core.c
> +++ b/drivers/phy/phy-core.c
> @@ -94,19 +94,27 @@ static struct phy_provider *of_phy_provider_lookup(struct 
> device_node *node)
>  
>  int phy_pm_runtime_get(struct phy *phy)
>  {
> +     int ret;
> +
>       if (!pm_runtime_enabled(&phy->dev))
>               return -ENOTSUPP;
>  
> -     return pm_runtime_get(&phy->dev);
> +     ret = pm_runtime_get(&phy->dev);
> +     if (ret < 0 && ret != -EINPROGRESS)
> +             pm_runtime_put_noidle(&phy->dev);
>  }
>  EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(phy_pm_runtime_get);
>  
>  int phy_pm_runtime_get_sync(struct phy *phy)
>  {
> +     int ret;
> +
>       if (!pm_runtime_enabled(&phy->dev))
>               return -ENOTSUPP;
>  
> -     return pm_runtime_get_sync(&phy->dev);
> +     ret = pm_runtime_get_sync(&phy->dev);
> +     if (ret < 0)
> +             pm_runtime_put_sync(&phy->dev);
>  }
>  EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(phy_pm_runtime_get_sync);
>  
> 

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-usb" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to