On Sun, Sep 29, 2013 at 07:32:56PM +0200, Markus Rechberger wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 29, 2013 at 5:14 PM, Greg KH <gre...@linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
> > On Sun, Sep 29, 2013 at 04:02:56PM +0200, Markus Rechberger wrote:
> >> This patch adds memory mapping support to USBFS for isochronous and bulk
> >> data transfers, it allows to pre-allocate usb transfer buffers.
> >>
> >> The CPU usage decreases 1-2% on my 1.3ghz U7300 notebook
> >> The CPU usage decreases 6-8% on an Intel Atom n270 when
> >> transferring 20mbyte/sec (isochronous), it should be more interesting to
> >> see those
> >> statistics on embedded systems where copying data is more expensive.
> >
> > Do you have a userspace test program that we can use to verify that this
> > does work, and that others can use to run on some different platforms to
> > verify that this is actually faster?
> >
> 
> You will need one of our devices for testing I guess. Some scanners
> (which use USBFS) or other low speed devices won't really utilize
> usbfs too much.  I think I could provide some grabber device for
> testing if you want to.

So no test userspace program you can knock up for us?  I really hate
adding new core functionality to the kernel that I have no way of
testing at all, that's a recipe for it quickly breaking...

greg k-h
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-usb" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to