On Tue, 2013-07-30 at 13:00 -0400, Alan Stern wrote:
> That's why I said the patch would fix the immediate problem but it
> wasn't the best solution. You do agree that the patch is correct, as
> far as it goes?
It will allow the system to sleep. But it seems to me that
a genuine error while flushing a drive's cache is one of the
few things actual worth aborting a system suspend for.
> If you would like to handle the problems in sd.c concerning the
> sync-cache and spin-down stuff, that will be fine with me.
Yes. The problem is not limited to USB.
Regards
Oliver
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-usb" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
