On Thu, Jul 11, 2013 at 11:28:38AM -0400, Alan Stern wrote: > On Thu, 11 Jul 2013, Johannes Stezenbach wrote: > > > Can you confirm that in the error case there is no IN token at all? > > That's what the analyzer log showed. Of course, it's possible that the > analyzer itself was faulty, but I don't think so because Devin said the > missing packets matched exactly with the corrupted data in the > following microframes.
I think there is the possibility the analyzer view is configured to not show details of unanswered IN tokens. But I don't know TotalPhase, I only used LeCroy at a customer's site and it has lots of filters and options for the trace view. Since it makes a big difference for the bug hunt I'm asking for double confirmation. Johannes -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-usb" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
