2013/6/14 Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shish...@linux.intel.com>: > Barry Song <21cn...@gmail.com> writes: > >> 2013/6/14 Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shish...@linux.intel.com>: >>> Barry Song <21cn...@gmail.com> writes: >>> >>>> +if USB_CHIPIDEA_UDC && USB_CHIPIDEA_HOST >>>> + >>>> +config USB_CHIPIDEA_SIRF >>>> + depends on ARCH_SIRF >>>> + bool "SiRF USB controller ChipIdea driver binding" >>>> + default y >>>> + help >>>> + Say Y here to enable sirf usb ChipIdea driver binding. >>>> + >>>> +config USB_CHIPIDEA_MSM >>>> + depends on ARCH_MSM >>>> + bool "MSM USB controller ChipIdea driver binding" >>>> + default y >>>> + help >>>> + Say Y here to enable msm usb ChipIdea driver binding. >>>> + >>>> +config USB_CHIPIDEA_IMX >>>> + depends on ARCH_MXC || ARCH_MXS >>>> + bool "i.MX USB controller ChipIdea driver binding" >>>> + default y >>>> + help >>>> + Say Y here to enable imx usb ChipIdea driver binding. >>>> + >>>> +endif >>> >>> No. This is wrong on at least 3 different levels. >> >> the point is we don't directly include MSM, IMX, SiRF and all other >> drivers once we enable chipidea. that makes these drivers optional, >> not always be built-in. > > This has been discussed several times already. Just set the > USB_CHIPIDEA=m and then everything will be built as modules and nothing > will be built in. What exactly is the problem you're trying to solve > with this? >
Alex, it seems it is not much a generic way to use building-module to avoid all involved components built-in. but since you have discussed several times and got agreement, i'll follow it and don't re-open it. > The only way something like this will go in is with Jiri's COMPILE_TEST > patchset. This snippet above is just buggy. > > Regards, > -- > Alex -barry -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-usb" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
