On Tue, Mar 05, 2013 at 05:13:54PM +0800, Peter Chen wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 01, 2013 at 03:42:27PM +0100, Michael Grzeschik wrote:
> > This patch removes the limitation of having a limited amount of only
> > four active tds on one endpoint. We use the linked list implementation
> > to manage all tds which get added and removed by hardware_{en,de}queue.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Michael Grzeschik <m.grzesc...@pengutronix.de>
> > ---
> >  drivers/usb/chipidea/udc.c |   79 
> > ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------
> >  1 file changed, 58 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/usb/chipidea/udc.c b/drivers/usb/chipidea/udc.c
> > index 98433cd..58efa49 100644
> > --- a/drivers/usb/chipidea/udc.c
> > +++ b/drivers/usb/chipidea/udc.c
> > @@ -415,7 +415,9 @@ static void setup_td_bits(struct td_node *tdnode, 
> > unsigned length)
> >  
> >  static int add_td_to_list(struct ci13xxx_ep *mEp, struct ci13xxx_req 
> > *mReq, unsigned length)
> >  {
> > +   int i;
> >     struct td_node *lastnode, *node = kzalloc(sizeof(struct td_node), 
> > GFP_ATOMIC);
> > +   u32 temp;
> >  
> >     if (node == NULL)
> >             return -ENOMEM;
> > @@ -429,6 +431,15 @@ static int add_td_to_list(struct ci13xxx_ep *mEp, 
> > struct ci13xxx_req *mReq, unsi
> >  
> >     setup_td_bits(node, length);
> >  
> > +   temp = (u32) (mReq->req.dma + mReq->req.actual);
> > +   if (length) {
> > +           node->ptr->page[0] = temp;
> > +           for (i = 1; i <= TD_COUNT; i++)
> > +                   node->ptr->page[i] = (temp + i * CI13XXX_PAGE_SIZE) & 
> > ~TD_RESERVED_MASK;
> > +   }
> > +
> > +   mReq->req.actual += length;
> > +
> >     /* get the last entry */
> >     lastnode = list_entry(mReq->tds.prev,
> >                     struct td_node, td);
> > @@ -454,6 +465,7 @@ static int _hardware_enqueue(struct ci13xxx_ep *mEp, 
> > struct ci13xxx_req *mReq)
> >     int ret = 0;
> >     unsigned length = mReq->req.length;
> >     struct td_node *reqnode, *lastnode;
> > +   unsigned reqnodesize = min(length, (unsigned)(TD_COUNT * 
> > CI13XXX_PAGE_SIZE));
> >  
> >     /* don't queue twice */
> >     if (mReq->req.status == -EALREADY)
> > @@ -468,13 +480,25 @@ static int _hardware_enqueue(struct ci13xxx_ep *mEp, 
> > struct ci13xxx_req *mReq)
> >     reqnode = list_first_entry(&mReq->tds,
> >                     struct td_node, td);
> >  
> > -   setup_td_bits(reqnode, length);
> > +   setup_td_bits(reqnode, reqnodesize);
> >  
> >     reqnode->ptr->page[0] = mReq->req.dma;
> >     for (i = 1; i <= TD_COUNT; i++)
> >             reqnode->ptr->page[i] =
> >                     (mReq->req.dma + i * CI13XXX_PAGE_SIZE) & 
> > ~TD_RESERVED_MASK;
> >  
> > +   mReq->req.actual += reqnodesize;
> > +
> > +   if (length > TD_COUNT * CI13XXX_PAGE_SIZE) {
> > +           int rest = length - mReq->req.actual;
> > +           while (rest > 0) {
> > +                   unsigned count = min(length - mReq->req.actual,
> > +                                           (unsigned)(TD_COUNT * 
> > CI13XXX_PAGE_SIZE));
> 
> You can use rest instead of "length - mReq->req.actual".

Yes, i will fix.

> > +                   add_td_to_list(mEp, mReq, count);
> > +                   rest -= TD_COUNT * CI13XXX_PAGE_SIZE;
> > +           }
> > +   }
> > +
> >     if (mReq->req.zero && length && (length % mEp->ep.maxpacket == 0))
> >             add_td_to_list(mEp, mReq, 0);
> >  
> > @@ -485,6 +509,7 @@ static int _hardware_enqueue(struct ci13xxx_ep *mEp, 
> > struct ci13xxx_req *mReq)
> >     if (!mReq->req.no_interrupt)
> >             lastnode->ptr->token |= TD_IOC;
> >  
> > +   mReq->req.actual = 0;
> 
> Any reasons to do it here? The ep_queue will do it later.

No it was doing it before calling hardware_enqueue. So i change it back
here. That indeed seems like we misuse this variable in that code.
I will fix this.

> > @@ -532,6 +557,8 @@ done:
> >  static int _hardware_dequeue(struct ci13xxx_ep *mEp, struct ci13xxx_req 
> > *mReq)

[snip]

> > -   mReq->req.actual   = node_first->ptr->token & TD_TOTAL_BYTES;
> > -   mReq->req.actual >>= ffs_nr(TD_TOTAL_BYTES);
> > -   mReq->req.actual   = mReq->req.length - mReq->req.actual;
> > +   mReq->req.actual = actual;
> 
> If the mReq->req.actual will be changed at below line, any reasons to do it?

Correct, will remove that.

> >     mReq->req.actual   = mReq->req.status ? 0 : mReq->req.actual;

I will fix that to:

        mReq->req.actual = mReq->req.status ? 0 : actual;

-- 
Pengutronix e.K.                           |                             |
Industrial Linux Solutions                 | http://www.pengutronix.de/  |
Peiner Str. 6-8, 31137 Hildesheim, Germany | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0    |
Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686           | Fax:   +49-5121-206917-5555 |
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-usb" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to