> -----Original Message-----
> From: Lan, Tianyu
> Sent: Thursday, February 28, 2013 4:37 PM
> To: Li, Fei; st...@rowland.harvard.edu
> Cc: gre...@linuxfoundation.org; sarah.a.sh...@linux.intel.com; r...@sisk.pl;
> linux-usb@vger.kernel.org; linux-ker...@vger.kernel.org; Liu, Chuansheng
> Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/5] usb: call pm_runtime_put_sync in
> pm_runtime_get_sync failed case
>
> On 2013年02月28日 15:57, Li Fei wrote:
> >
> > Even in failed case of pm_runtime_get_sync, the usage_count
> > is incremented. In order to keep the usage_count with correct
> > value and runtime power management to behave correctly, call
> > pm_runtime_put(_sync) in such case.
>
> Hi Fei:
> It's not necessary. Because the did_runtime_put == true means the
> port's usage count has already been decreased during
> usb_port_suspend().So to keep usage count balance, we should increase
> the usage count in the usb_port_resume() whatever.
Thanks for your reminder.
Sorry, I forget to keep did_runtime_put as false in pm_runtime_get_sync
failed case. I'll submit patch V2 to update it.
> >
> > Signed-off-by Liu Chuansheng <chuansheng....@intel.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Li Fei <fei...@intel.com>
> > ---
> > drivers/usb/core/hub.c | 1 +
> > 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/usb/core/hub.c b/drivers/usb/core/hub.c
> > index 5480352..b68493b 100644
> > --- a/drivers/usb/core/hub.c
> > +++ b/drivers/usb/core/hub.c
> > @@ -3152,6 +3152,7 @@ int usb_port_resume(struct usb_device *udev,
> pm_message_t msg)
> > if (status < 0) {
> > dev_dbg(&udev->dev, "can't resume usb port, status
> > %d\n",
> > status);
> > + pm_runtime_put_sync(&port_dev->dev);
> > return status;
> > }
> > }
> >
> Hi Alan:
> Further thinking, the device should be disconnected since the port
> can't be resumed and the device will not work normally. Something like
> following. Does this make sense?
> ---
> diff --git a/drivers/usb/core/hub.c b/drivers/usb/core/hub.c
> index d5d3de4..cf36b11 100644
> --- a/drivers/usb/core/hub.c
> +++ b/drivers/usb/core/hub.c
> @@ -3170,6 +3170,7 @@ int usb_port_resume(struct usb_device *udev,
> pm_message_t msg)
> if (status < 0) {
> dev_dbg(&udev->dev, "can't resume usb port,
> status %d\n",
> status);
> + hub_port_logical_disconnect(hub, port1);
IMHO, this can't keep the usage_count balance.
Best Regards,
Li Fei
> return status;
> }
> }
>
>
> --
> Best regards
> Tianyu Lan
