On Thu, Feb 14, 2013 at 07:43:54PM +0100, Sascha Hauer wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 14, 2013 at 08:00:11PM +0200, Felipe Balbi wrote:
> > Hi,
> > 
> > On Thu, Feb 14, 2013 at 05:23:37PM +0100, Sascha Hauer wrote:
> > > On Thu, Feb 14, 2013 at 12:37:29PM +0200, Felipe Balbi wrote:
> > > > Hi,
> > > > 
> > > > On Thu, Jan 31, 2013 at 12:32:16PM +0100, Sascha Hauer wrote:
> > > > > We now have usb_add_phy_dev(), so use it to register with the 
> > > > > framework
> > > > > to be able to find the phy from the USB driver.
> > > > > 
> > > > > Signed-off-by: Sascha Hauer <s.ha...@pengutronix.de>
> > > > 
> > > > Sascha, are you taking this through your tree or you want me to queue it
> > > > up ?
> > > 
> > > I would prefer if either you could take it or Alexander Shishkin along
> > > with the other patches in:
> > > 
> > > [PATCH v4] USB: add devicetree helpers for determining dr_mode and 
> > > phy_type
> > > 
> > > Could you have a look at them? Alexander is asking for an ack for 1/9,
> > > 2/9, 3/9, 8/9. I just realized you are not on Cc for these. I could
> > > bounce you the patches in case you don't have them in your mailbox.
> > 
> > Ok, I'll look at them, no need to bounce. You _do_ realize, however,
> > that Greg has already closed all his trees for v3.9, right ? So anything
> > from now on will be queued for v3.10.
> 
> I'm fine with that. I'm just a bit insistent because the chipidea patches are
> floating around for half a year now. Once I have the warm feeling that
> the patches are handled I have time ;)

I'm getting ready to queue patches but, when looking at this thread, it
seems like another version should've been sent. I'll skip this and look
at the other chipidea threads,

cheers

-- 
balbi

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Reply via email to