On Wed, Jan 30, 2013 at 12:31:04PM +0200, Alexander Shishkin wrote:
> Peter Chen <peter.c...@freescale.com> writes:
> 
> > On Wed, Jan 30, 2013 at 11:36:42AM +0530, kishon wrote:
> >> Hi,
> >> 
> >> >          bool                            global_phy;
> >> >          struct usb_phy                  *transceiver;
> >> >          struct usb_hcd                  *hcd;
> >> >- struct usb_otg      otg;
> >> >+ struct usb_otg                  otg;
> >> You have added *otg* in previous patch and added a tab for *otg* in
> >> this patch.
> > thanks, I will change at previous patch
> >> 
> >> >+
> >> >+#define CI_VBUS_STABLE_TIMEOUT 500
> >> 
> >> Just curious.. how was this timeout value obtained?
> >
> > Just a timeout value, if the vbus goes to required value, it will quit.
> > Besides, 5s for vbus stable should be enough for an well behaviour hardware.
> 
> Can you also mention this in the patch, since it raises questions?

Sure, do you have other ideas about next version patch?
> 
> Thanks,
> --
> Alex
> 

-- 

Best Regards,
Peter Chen

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-usb" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to