There is no need to use GFP_ATOMIC when calling 'usb_alloc_coherent()'
here. These calls are done from probe functions and using GFP_KERNEL should
be safe.
The memory itself is used within some interrupts, but it is not a
problem, once it has been allocated.

Signed-off-by: Christophe JAILLET <christophe.jail...@wanadoo.fr>
---
 drivers/hid/usbhid/usbkbd.c   | 4 ++--
 drivers/hid/usbhid/usbmouse.c | 2 +-
 2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/hid/usbhid/usbkbd.c b/drivers/hid/usbhid/usbkbd.c
index d5b7a696a68c..63e8ef8beb45 100644
--- a/drivers/hid/usbhid/usbkbd.c
+++ b/drivers/hid/usbhid/usbkbd.c
@@ -239,11 +239,11 @@ static int usb_kbd_alloc_mem(struct usb_device *dev, 
struct usb_kbd *kbd)
                return -1;
        if (!(kbd->led = usb_alloc_urb(0, GFP_KERNEL)))
                return -1;
-       if (!(kbd->new = usb_alloc_coherent(dev, 8, GFP_ATOMIC, &kbd->new_dma)))
+       if (!(kbd->new = usb_alloc_coherent(dev, 8, GFP_KERNEL, &kbd->new_dma)))
                return -1;
        if (!(kbd->cr = kmalloc(sizeof(struct usb_ctrlrequest), GFP_KERNEL)))
                return -1;
-       if (!(kbd->leds = usb_alloc_coherent(dev, 1, GFP_ATOMIC, 
&kbd->leds_dma)))
+       if (!(kbd->leds = usb_alloc_coherent(dev, 1, GFP_KERNEL, 
&kbd->leds_dma)))
                return -1;
 
        return 0;
diff --git a/drivers/hid/usbhid/usbmouse.c b/drivers/hid/usbhid/usbmouse.c
index 073127e65ac1..c89332017d5d 100644
--- a/drivers/hid/usbhid/usbmouse.c
+++ b/drivers/hid/usbhid/usbmouse.c
@@ -130,7 +130,7 @@ static int usb_mouse_probe(struct usb_interface *intf, 
const struct usb_device_i
        if (!mouse || !input_dev)
                goto fail1;
 
-       mouse->data = usb_alloc_coherent(dev, 8, GFP_ATOMIC, &mouse->data_dma);
+       mouse->data = usb_alloc_coherent(dev, 8, GFP_KERNEL, &mouse->data_dma);
        if (!mouse->data)
                goto fail1;
 
-- 
2.20.1

Reply via email to