> > >
> > > 4.14.102 is still old.
> > I agree
> >
> > > > Porting a 5.1 will take a lot of effort.
> > >
> > > Then that implies you have an SoC with a few million lines of code added
> > > to the kernel, right?  Nothing we can do here about that mess, you need
> > > to go ask for support from the vendor that is forcing you to use that
> > > kernel, sorry :(
> > >
> >
> > Well its at least an x86-64 based SoC.
> 
> An x86 SoC should work on 5.1, what is missing there to keep it from
> functioning?  Why hasn't it already been updated to 4.19.y?
> 
> thanks,
> 
> greg k-h
- Long term stabilisation of product.
- Concerns a product update - already in production
- A big bunch of testing done on the product
- Bug occurence currently "once" - no reproduction
Hard work.

Best regards
Carsten

Reply via email to