On Tue, May 21, 2019 at 05:44:50PM +0000, Ajay Gupta wrote:
> Hi Heikki
>
> > > +static int ucsi_ccg_resume(struct device *dev) {
> > > + struct i2c_client *client = to_i2c_client(dev);
> > > + struct ucsi_ccg *uc = i2c_get_clientdata(client);
> > > + struct ucsi *ucsi = uc->ucsi;
> > > + struct ucsi_control c;
> > > + int ret;
> > > +
> > > + /* restore UCSI notification enable mask */
> > > + UCSI_CMD_SET_NTFY_ENABLE(c, UCSI_ENABLE_NTFY_ALL);
> > > + ret = ucsi_send_command(ucsi, &c, NULL, 0);
> > > + if (ret < 0) {
> > > + dev_err(uc->dev, "%s: failed to set notification enable - %d\n",
> > > + __func__, ret);
> > > + }
> > > + return 0;
> > > +}
> >
> > I would prefer that we did this for all methods in ucsi.c, not just ccgx.
> > Could you
> > add resume callback to struct ucsi_ppm, and then call it here.
> struct ucsi_ppm currently have .sync() and .cmd() callback which is
> implemented by
> ucsi_ccg and ucsi_acpi and invoked by usci.c.
>
> Is it okay to add a callback in this structure and implement inside ucsi.c
> and invoke
> from ucsi_ccg and ucsi_acpi? OR we can just add a function in ucsi.c and
> export it
> and use it from ucsi_ccg and ucsi_acpi?
Right! Export the function. Sorry.
thanks,
--
heikki
