On Fri, 17 May 2019, Marek Szyprowski wrote:
> Commit 69bec7259853 ("USB: core: let USB device know device node") added
> support for attaching devicetree node for USB devices. Those nodes are
> children of their USB host controller. However Exynos EHCI and OHCI
> driver bindings already define child-nodes for each physical root hub
> port and assigns respective PHY controller and parameters to them. Those
> bindings predates support for USB device tree nodes.
>
> To mitigate the side-effects of the conflict between those bindings,
> lets reset Exynos host controller of_node pointer before registering it
> to USB subsystem. This fixes the issue raised by the commit 01fdf179f4b0
> ("usb: core: skip interfaces disabled in devicetree"), which incorrectly
> disabled some devices on Exynos based boards.
>
> Reported-by: Markus Reichl <m.rei...@fivetechno.de>
> Suggested-by: Måns Rullgård <m...@mansr.com>
> Signed-off-by: Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprow...@samsung.com>
> ---
> v4:
> - moved workaround to Exynos OHCI/EHCI drivers as suggested by Måns
>
> v3: https://lkml.org/lkml/2019/5/9/119
> - replaced ad hoc checks by proper test for proper value of the
> compatible string in drivers/usb/core/of.c
>
> v2: https://lkml.org/lkml/2019/5/8/321
>
> v1: https://lkml.org/lkml/2019/5/7/715
> ---
> drivers/usb/host/ehci-exynos.c | 10 ++++++++++
> drivers/usb/host/ohci-exynos.c | 10 ++++++++++
> 2 files changed, 20 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/usb/host/ehci-exynos.c b/drivers/usb/host/ehci-exynos.c
> index 8e3bab1e0c1f..b127642332ee 100644
> --- a/drivers/usb/host/ehci-exynos.c
> +++ b/drivers/usb/host/ehci-exynos.c
> @@ -39,6 +39,7 @@ static struct hc_driver __read_mostly exynos_ehci_hc_driver;
>
> struct exynos_ehci_hcd {
> struct clk *clk;
> + struct device_node *of_node;
> struct phy *phy[PHY_NUMBER];
> };
>
> @@ -203,6 +204,13 @@ static int exynos_ehci_probe(struct platform_device
> *pdev)
> ehci = hcd_to_ehci(hcd);
> ehci->caps = hcd->regs;
>
> + /*
> + * Workaround: reset of_node pointer to avoid conflict between Exynos
> + * EHCI port subnodes and generic USB device bindings
> + */
> + exynos_ehci->of_node = pdev->dev.of_node;
> + pdev->dev.of_node = NULL;
> +
> /* DMA burst Enable */
> writel(EHCI_INSNREG00_ENABLE_DMA_BURST, EHCI_INSNREG00(hcd->regs));
>
You forgot to adjust the fail_add_hcd: error pathway in
exynos_ehci_probe().
> @@ -231,6 +239,8 @@ static int exynos_ehci_remove(struct platform_device
> *pdev)
> struct usb_hcd *hcd = platform_get_drvdata(pdev);
> struct exynos_ehci_hcd *exynos_ehci = to_exynos_ehci(hcd);
>
> + pdev->dev.of_node = exynos_ehci->of_node;
> +
> usb_remove_hcd(hcd);
>
> exynos_ehci_phy_disable(&pdev->dev);
> diff --git a/drivers/usb/host/ohci-exynos.c b/drivers/usb/host/ohci-exynos.c
> index c0c4dcca6f3c..29f65963af3b 100644
> --- a/drivers/usb/host/ohci-exynos.c
> +++ b/drivers/usb/host/ohci-exynos.c
> @@ -30,6 +30,7 @@ static struct hc_driver __read_mostly exynos_ohci_hc_driver;
>
> struct exynos_ohci_hcd {
> struct clk *clk;
> + struct device_node *of_node;
> struct phy *phy[PHY_NUMBER];
> };
>
> @@ -170,6 +171,13 @@ static int exynos_ohci_probe(struct platform_device
> *pdev)
> goto fail_io;
> }
>
> + /*
> + * Workaround: reset of_node pointer to avoid conflict between Exynos
> + * OHCI port subnodes and generic USB device bindings
> + */
> + exynos_ohci->of_node = pdev->dev.of_node;
> + pdev->dev.of_node = NULL;
> +
> err = usb_add_hcd(hcd, irq, IRQF_SHARED);
> if (err) {
> dev_err(&pdev->dev, "Failed to add USB HCD\n");
And same here.
Alan Stern
> @@ -192,6 +200,8 @@ static int exynos_ohci_remove(struct platform_device
> *pdev)
> struct usb_hcd *hcd = platform_get_drvdata(pdev);
> struct exynos_ohci_hcd *exynos_ohci = to_exynos_ohci(hcd);
>
> + pdev->dev.of_node = exynos_ohci->of_node;
> +
> usb_remove_hcd(hcd);
>
> exynos_ohci_phy_disable(&pdev->dev);
>
