> -----Original Message----- > From: Heikki Krogerus <heikki.kroge...@linux.intel.com> > Sent: 2019年3月13日 17:36 > To: Rob Herring <r...@kernel.org> > Cc: Jun Li <jun...@nxp.com>; gre...@linuxfoundation.org; hdego...@redhat.com; > andy.shevche...@gmail.com; linux-usb@vger.kernel.org; > devicet...@vger.kernel.org; dl-linux-imx <linux-...@nxp.com> > Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] dt-bindings: usb: add documentation for typec > switch > via GPIO > > On Tue, Mar 12, 2019 at 09:45:27AM -0500, Rob Herring wrote: > > On Mon, Mar 11, 2019 at 10:40:09AM +0000, Jun Li wrote: > > > Some typec super speed active channel switch can be controlled via a > > > GPIO, this binding can be used to specify the switch node by a GPIO > > > and the remote endpoint of its consumer. > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Li Jun <jun...@nxp.com> > > > --- > > > .../devicetree/bindings/usb/typec-switch-gpio.txt | 30 > > > ++++++++++++++++++++++ > > > 1 file changed, 30 insertions(+) > > > > > > diff --git > > > a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/usb/typec-switch-gpio.txt > > > b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/usb/typec-switch-gpio.txt > > > new file mode 100644 > > > index 0000000..4ef76cf > > > --- /dev/null > > > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/usb/typec-switch-gpio.txt > > > @@ -0,0 +1,30 @@ > > > +Typec orientation switch via a GPIO > > > +----------------------------------- > > > + > > > +Required properties: > > > +- compatible: should be set one of following: > > > + - "nxp,ptn36043" for NXP Type-C SuperSpeed active switch. > > > + > > > +- gpios: the GPIO used to switch the super speed active channel, > > > > Perhaps switch-gpios in case there are other gpios needed. > > > > > + GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH: GPIO state high for cc1; > > > + GPIO_ACTIVE_LOW: GPIO state low for cc1. > > > +- orientation-switch: must be present. > > > > Why is this needed? The compatible can't imply this? > > I think Jun Li is added that based on the comment I put to > drivers/usb/typec/mux.c, > so I'm to blame here. If we can handle this with the compatible like I guess > we can, > I'm happy.
Hi Heikki Can I just remove the original bool property check? i.e, match OK if the remote parent node is in switch_list. Thanks Li Jun > > thanks, > > -- > heikki
