On Fri, Dec 14, 2012 at 10:22 PM, Oliver Neukum <oneu...@suse.de> wrote: > > On second thought, I think that if a driver can do manage_power(), even > only for a subset of devices, it should implement it. Doctoring the table of > methods > is very, very ugly,
Sorry, why is it very ugly? netdev_ops/ethtool_ops is still set dynamically inside bind(). > especially as this not protected by a lock. Looks lock isn't needed since probe/remove and open/close path can't be concurrent. Thanks, -- Ming Lei -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-usb" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
