Hi,
On Tue, Feb 12, 2019 at 06:03:42AM +0000, Jun Li wrote:
> > > return dev_fwnode(dev->parent) == fwnode;
> >
> > That's actually not the case. struct usb_role_switch_desc has a member for
> > fwnode,
> > and that's what we use with the actual mux device. Check
> > usb_role_switch_register():
> >
> > ...
> > sw->dev.fwnode = desc->fwnode;
> > ...
> >
> > Sorry for not realizing it before.
>
> So desc->fwnode should be initialized before do usb_role_switch_register()?
> But seems usb_role_switch_desc is a read-only object so can't be set at
> runtime.
It can. Even though usb_role_switch_register() takes read-only
parameter, nothing's preventing you from passing data even from the
stack (the content of the descriptor is copied in any case).
Expecting the descriptor to be read-only just means it can be
read-only, but it does not have to be.
> usb_controller_node {
> ...
> usb-role-switch;
>
> port {
> sw_provider_node: endpoint {
> remote-endpoint = <&sw_consumer_node>;
> };
> };
> };
>
> typec_node {
> ...
> port {
> sw_consumer_node: endpoint {
> remote-endpoint = <&sw_provider_node>;
> };
> };
> };
That looks roughly correct to me.
thanks,
--
heikki
