Hi Felipe
>
>Pawel Laszczak <paw...@cadence.com> writes:
><snip>
>
>>>> + case USB_REQ_SET_ISOCH_DELAY:
>>>> + sprintf(str, "Set Isochronous Delay Delay: %d ns", wValue);
>>>> + break;
>>>> + default:
>>>> + sprintf(str,
>>>> + "SETUP BRT: %02x BR: %02x V: %04x I: %04x L: %04x\n",
>>>> + bRequestType, bRequest,
>>>> + wValue, wIndex, wLength);
>>>> + }
>>>> +
>>>> + return str;
>>>> +}
>>>
>>>All of these are a flat out copy of dwc3's implementation. It's much,
>>>much better to turn dwc3's implementation into a generic, reusable
>>>library function then spinning your own as a duplicated effort.
>> I agree,
>> It would be nice to have a set of decoding function in some generic
>> library. It could be used
>> also by other drivers.
>> Who should do this ?
>
>since you're the first to reuse it, then it should be you :-)
So I can prepare debug.h in drivers/usb/gadget directory.
Function form drivers/usb/dwc3/debug.h that could be common are:
static inline void dwc3_decode_get_status(__u8 t, __u16 i, __u16 l, char *str)
static inline void dwc3_decode_get_set_descriptor(__u8 t, __u8 b, __u16 v,
__u16 i, __u16 l, char *str)
static inline void dwc3_decode_set_clear_feature(__u8 t, __u8 b, __u16 v, __u16
i, char *str)
static inline void dwc3_decode_set_address(__u16 v, char *str)
static inline void dwc3_decode_get_set_descriptor(__u8 t, __u8 b, __u16 v,
__u16 i, __u16 l, char *str)
static inline void dwc3_decode_get_configuration(__u16 l, char *str)
static inline void dwc3_decode_set_configuration(__u8 v, char *str)
static inline void dwc3_decode_get_intf(__u16 i, __u16 l, char *str)
static inline void dwc3_decode_set_intf(__u8 v, __u16 i, char *str)
static inline void dwc3_decode_synch_frame(__u16 i, __u16 l, char *str)
static inline const char *dwc3_decode_ctrl(char *str, __u8 bRequestType, __u8
bRequest, __u16 wValue, __u16 wIndex, __u16 wLength)
After changed it could looks like:
static inline void usb_decode_get_status(__u8 bRequestType, __u16 wIndex, __u16
wLength, char *str)
static inline void usb _decode_get_set_descriptor(__u8 bRequestType, __u8
bRequest, __u16 wValue,
__u16 wIndex, __u16 wLength,
char *str)
static inline void usb_decode_set_clear_feature(__u8 bRequestType, __u8
bRequest, __u16 wValue, __u16 wIndex, char *str)
static inline void usb_decode_set_address(__u16 v, char *str)
static inline void usb_decode_get_set_descriptor(__u8 bRequestType, __u8
bRequest, __u16 wValue, __u16 wIndex, __u16 wLength, char *str)
static inline void usb_decode_get_configuration(__u16 wLength, char *str)
static inline void usb_decode_set_configuration(__u8 wValue, char *str)
static inline void usb_decode_get_intf(__u16 wIndex, __u16 wLength, char *str)
static inline void usb_decode_set_intf(__u8 wValue, __u16 wIndex, char *str)
static inline void usb_decode_synch_frame(__u16 wIndex, __u16 wLength, char
*str)
static inline const char * usb _decode_ctrl(char *str, __u8 bRequestType, __u8
bRequest, __u16 wValue, __u16 wIndex, __u16 wLength)
Sorry but I prefer some more significant names :)
For me functions in drivers/usb/dwc3/debug.h looks ok, but I think that could
be better to
add additional usb_decode_test_mode and usb_decode_device_feature and little
simplify usb_decode_get_set_descriptor.
What do you think about this?
One more question.
Can I add drivers/usb/gadget/debug.h file as part of my set patches, or this
should be done as separate, new patch ?
Cheers,
Pawel
