On 2018-10-05 22:24, David Miller wrote:
From: Ben Dooks <ben.do...@codethink.co.uk>
Date: Tue, 2 Oct 2018 17:56:02 +0100
- memcpy(skb->data, &tx_cmd_a, 4);
+ ptr = skb_push(skb, 8);
+ tx_cmd_a = cpu_to_le32(tx_cmd_a);
+ tx_cmd_b = cpu_to_le32(tx_cmd_b);
+ memcpy(ptr, &tx_cmd_a, 4);
+ memcpy(ptr+4, &tx_cmd_b, 4);
Even a memcpy() through a void pointer does not guarantee that gcc will
not emit word sized loads and stores.
You must use the get_unaligned()/put_unaligned() facilities to do this
properly.
Thanks, got a new version of the series just being tested with this.
Should it go into the original, or as a separate change?
I also agree that making a proper type and structure instead of using
a void pointer would be better.
