On 4/23/2018 14:03, Giuseppe Lippolis wrote:
The dwm-158 interface 4 and 5 doesn't answer to the AT commands and doesn't appears a option interface. Tested on openwrt distribution (kernel 4.14 using the old blacklist definitions).Signed-off-by: Giuseppe Lippolis <giu.lippo...@gmail.com> --- drivers/usb/serial/option.c | 3 ++- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/drivers/usb/serial/option.c b/drivers/usb/serial/option.c index c3f252283ab9..f0c3612467a3 100644 --- a/drivers/usb/serial/option.c +++ b/drivers/usb/serial/option.c @@ -1911,7 +1911,8 @@ static const struct usb_device_id option_ids[] = { { USB_DEVICE_INTERFACE_CLASS(0x2001, 0x7d01, 0xff) }, /* D-Link DWM-156 (variant) */ { USB_DEVICE_INTERFACE_CLASS(0x2001, 0x7d02, 0xff) }, { USB_DEVICE_INTERFACE_CLASS(0x2001, 0x7d03, 0xff) }, - { USB_DEVICE_INTERFACE_CLASS(0x2001, 0x7d04, 0xff) }, /* D-Link DWM-158 */ + { USB_DEVICE_INTERFACE_CLASS(0x2001, 0x7d04, 0xff), /* D-Link DWM-158 */ + .driver_info = RSVD(4) | RSVD(5) }, { USB_DEVICE_INTERFACE_CLASS(0x2001, 0x7d0e, 0xff) }, /* D-Link DWM-157 C1 */ { USB_DEVICE_INTERFACE_CLASS(0x2001, 0x7e19, 0xff), /* D-Link DWM-221 B1 */ .driver_info = RSVD(4) },
Blacklisting interface 4 and 5 is correct because: MI_00 D-Link Mobile Broadband Device (cdc_ether) MI_02 D-Link HSPA+DataCard Diagnostics Interface (also ppp modem) MI_03 D-Link HSPA+DataCard NMEA Device MI_04 D-Link HSPA+DataCard Speech Port MI_05 D-Link HSPA+DataCard Debug Port MI_06 USB Mass Storage Device rgds /Lars -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-usb" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
