On Thu, Mar 08, 2018 at 01:41:23AM +0000, Jun Li wrote:
> > If you are asking my opinion, the data role must be handled as separate
> > capability of the port, i.e. you probable want to have separate properties 
> > for
> > the power role and data role, even if we did not support that yet in the 
> > class
> > code. Don't use "port-type" name, just call them "power-role" and
> > "data-role" from now on.
> > 
> 
> OK, I will introduce power-role and data-role, meanwhile, I think the class 
> code
> should be changed accordingly(looks like your attached patch is doing that).

True. I'll send the patch out now.


Thanks,

-- 
heikki
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-usb" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to