Hello.
On 11/21/2012 04:48 PM, Ming Lei wrote:
> If transceiver driver is built as module, the transceiver device
> may be added very late, so cause musb_init_controller() failed.
> This patch fixes the below error on 3.7-rcX:
> [ 19.052490] unable to find transceiver of type USB2 PHY
> [ 19.072052] HS USB OTG: no transceiver configured
> [ 19.076995] musb-hdrc musb-hdrc.0.auto: musb_init_controller failed with
> status -19
> [ 19.089355] musb-hdrc: probe of musb-hdrc.0.auto rejects match -19
> [ 19.096771] driver: 'musb-omap2430': driver_bound: bound to device
> 'musb-omap2430'
> [ 19.105194] bus: 'platform': really_probe: bound device musb-omap2430 to
> driver musb-omap2430
> [ 19.174407] bus: 'platform': add driver twl4030_usb
> [ 19.179656] bus: 'platform': driver_probe_device: matched device
> twl4030_usb with driver twl4030_usb
> [ 19.202270] bus: 'platform': really_probe: probing driver twl4030_usb with
> device twl4030_usb
> [ 19.214172] twl4030_usb twl4030_usb: HW_CONDITIONS 0xc0/192; link 3
> [ 19.239624] musb-omap2430 musb-omap2430: musb core is not yet ready
> [ 19.246765] twl4030_usb twl4030_usb: Initialized TWL4030 USB module
> [ 19.254516] driver: 'twl4030_usb': driver_bound: bound to device
> 'twl4030_usb'
> [ 19.263580] bus: 'platform': really_probe: bound device twl4030_usb to
> driver twl4030_usb
> Cc: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <sebast...@breakpoint.cc>
> Cc: Felipe Balbi <ba...@ti.com>
> Signed-off-by: Ming Lei <ming....@canonical.com>
> ---
> V1:
> - return -EPROBE_DEFER only for -ENODEV case as pointed by
> Sebastian
> ---
> drivers/usb/musb/musb_core.c | 5 ++++-
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/usb/musb/musb_core.c b/drivers/usb/musb/musb_core.c
> index 774d815..00aad8f 100644
> --- a/drivers/usb/musb/musb_core.c
> +++ b/drivers/usb/musb/musb_core.c
> @@ -1881,8 +1881,11 @@ musb_init_controller(struct device *dev, int nIrq,
> void __iomem *ctrl)
> * isp1504, non-OTG, etc) mostly hooking up through ULPI.
> */
> status = musb_platform_init(musb);
> - if (status < 0)
> + if (status < 0) {
> + /* try to defer probe if trasceiver is not ready */
> + status = (status == -ENODEV ? -EPROBE_DEFER : status);
This looks somewhat inelegant to my eye, I would propose longer:
if (status == -ENODEV)
status = -EPROBE_DEFER;
WBR, Sergei
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-usb" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
