From: Felipe Balbi <ba...@ti.com>
that check will have to be done by all users
of xhci_suspend() so it sounds a lot better to
move the check to xhci_suspend() in order to
avoid code duplication.
Signed-off-by: Felipe Balbi <ba...@ti.com>
Signed-off-by: Sarah Sharp <sarah.a.sh...@linux.intel.com>
---
drivers/usb/host/xhci-pci.c | 9 +--------
drivers/usb/host/xhci.c | 4 ++++
2 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/usb/host/xhci-pci.c b/drivers/usb/host/xhci-pci.c
index dcb72f7..af259e0 100644
--- a/drivers/usb/host/xhci-pci.c
+++ b/drivers/usb/host/xhci-pci.c
@@ -221,15 +221,8 @@ static void xhci_pci_remove(struct pci_dev *dev)
static int xhci_pci_suspend(struct usb_hcd *hcd, bool do_wakeup)
{
struct xhci_hcd *xhci = hcd_to_xhci(hcd);
- int retval = 0;
- if (hcd->state != HC_STATE_SUSPENDED ||
- xhci->shared_hcd->state != HC_STATE_SUSPENDED)
- return -EINVAL;
-
- retval = xhci_suspend(xhci);
-
- return retval;
+ return xhci_suspend(xhci);
}
static int xhci_pci_resume(struct usb_hcd *hcd, bool hibernated)
diff --git a/drivers/usb/host/xhci.c b/drivers/usb/host/xhci.c
index 09987d5..5c72c43 100644
--- a/drivers/usb/host/xhci.c
+++ b/drivers/usb/host/xhci.c
@@ -880,6 +880,10 @@ int xhci_suspend(struct xhci_hcd *xhci)
struct usb_hcd *hcd = xhci_to_hcd(xhci);
u32 command;
+ if (hcd->state != HC_STATE_SUSPENDED ||
+ xhci->shared_hcd->state != HC_STATE_SUSPENDED)
+ return -EINVAL;
+
spin_lock_irq(&xhci->lock);
clear_bit(HCD_FLAG_HW_ACCESSIBLE, &hcd->flags);
clear_bit(HCD_FLAG_HW_ACCESSIBLE, &xhci->shared_hcd->flags);
--
1.7.9
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-usb" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
