On Wed, 29 Aug 2012, megha dey wrote:
> I am hitting a dead end at the rpm_resume function as opposed to
> rpm_suspend in the commit ID specified.Below is a diff of the
> file,wherein I have moved the wake_up_all() location,just above the
> failure case (schedule()) and this solves the issue.I would like to
> know if this is the right place to apply this change.
> Also,can this cause some other issues to crop up?
Wait a minute... You said that you are using 3.0.31, not 3.0. The bug
I described _is_ present in 3.0.31, and the commit I mentioned should
fix it.
Even if you can't apply the patch directly, you can make an equivalent
change by hand. In rpm_suspend(), move the
wake_up_all(&dev->power.wait_queue);
line from where it is to just after
retval = rpm_callback(callback, dev);
Alan Stern
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-usb" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
