On Mon, Aug 27, 2012 at 1:46 PM, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior > One
little question: Felipe suggested to replace the workqueue by a
threaded
> interrupt. You schedule the workqueue in interrupt context and once in ep0
> enqueue. The enqueue should be fine by executing one round and waiting for the
> interrupt. Any reason why you suggested against it?

A couple of rounds could pass with no interrupt, e.g. if a
SET_CONFIGURATION request and a SET_INTERFACE request are both
pending.

Also, I ran into deadlocks when trying to invoke the gadget driver's
callback from within the UDC enqueue function.

I did attempt it; V2 of the patch had the workqueue removed, but I
backed out the change for V3 after seeing so many problems.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-usb" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to