On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 12:40 AM, Felipe Balbi <ba...@ti.com> wrote: > no workqueues, please either handle the IRQ here or use threaded_irqs. > > again, no workqueues.
Felipe, I am seeing all sorts of deadlocks now, after removing the workqueue (patch V2). Some have easy fixes, but for others it is not as obvious. The code was much simpler when I could just trigger a deferred worker function. Workqueues are used in at91_udc, lpc32xx_udc, mv_udc_core, and pch_udc. Could you please clarify why it is not OK to use one in bcm63xx_udc? Thanks. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-usb" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
