On 07/12/2012 04:21 PM, Oleksij Rempel wrote: >> On 07/09/2012 10:17 PM, Alan Stern wrote: >>> On Sun, 8 Jul 2012, Jonathan Nieder wrote: >>> >>>> Eric Ding wrote: >>>> >>>>> So it looks like you'd have to both look for USB_CLASS_VIDEO and check >>>>> uvc_ids[] too... which becomes somewhat hairy, since I assume you don't >>>>> realy want usb_detect_quirks() to reference UVC-specific structs... >>>>> which brings us back to the original laundry list approach of naming >>>>> several affected webcams explicitly, no? >>>> >>>> Why wouldn't I want usb_detect_quirks() to reference UVC-specific >>>> structs? >>> >>> Well, it's a layering violation. Not to mention a duplication of code. >>> >>> But if the alternative is to list every buggy webcam made by Logitech, >>> it might be worthwhile.
> according to device list here: > http://www.ideasonboard.org/uvc/ > we can safely use range of usb ids > plus combine information from here: > https://usb-ids.gowdy.us/read/UD/046d > > it looks like we can use range from 0800 - 9ff, but it will include some > usb microphones. I do not know if they are affected too. I think the microphones in that range are actually associated with webcams, so they may actually be safe to include. However, many of those listed at gowdy.us in that range are pre-UVC gspca-supported webcams, not UVC webcams, and there appears to be at least one webcam outsude of that range (d001 - QuickCam Pro, also gspca). Eric -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-usb" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
