Hi, On 07/06/2012 07:51 PM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
On Wed, Jul 04, 2012 at 09:18:03AM +0200, Hans de Goede wrote:+static void snoop_urb_data(struct urb *urb, unsigned len) +{ + int i, size; + + if (!usbfs_snoop) + return; + + if (urb->num_sgs == 0) { + print_hex_dump(KERN_DEBUG, "data: ", DUMP_PREFIX_NONE, 32, 1, + urb->transfer_buffer, len, 1); + return; + } + + for (i = 0; i < urb->num_sgs && len; i++) { + size = (len > USB_SG_SIZE) ? USB_SG_SIZE : len; + print_hex_dump(KERN_DEBUG, "data: ", DUMP_PREFIX_NONE, 32, 1, + sg_virt(&urb->sg[i]), size, 1); + len -= size; + } +}Minor cleanup in the future, can't this be merged with snoop_urb() that way you don't have to do the logic checking in the places you call this function instead of snoop_urb()? That would make it a bit simpler for the "normal" code path, right?
Alan already made the same remark :) The problem is that snoop_urb is also used for logging the synchronous urb ioctls, where there is no urb. So making snoop_urb generic would require it gaining a struct urb * argument while keeping its unsigned char *data and int data_len arguments, and add an if (urb) ... else in there, so this way seems better. Regards, Hans -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-usb" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
