hello On Sun, 2008-02-17 at 14:13 -0800, Pete Zaitcev wrote: > On Fri, 15 Feb 2008 09:38:14 +0100, "Paolo Abeni" wrote: > > > I'm again playing with usbmon and I think it would be useful, at least > > for testing purpose, being able to compile the usbmon device code as an > > external module. [] > > This can easily be accomplished by building USB core as a module.
True :-) Anyway the infrastructure to compile usbmon as a module is yet in place and take advantage of it will help save some memory when usbmon is not used. Moreover it's a bit more troublesome probe/remove the USB core (when compiled as a module) than the only usbmon (for example if I have [part of] my root file system mounted via usb-storage...) > > CONFIG_USB_MON_MMAP enable memory mapped access for the usbmon binary > > device > > If you're going to use it, we should just enable it. I'll send a > patch. I follow the example of packet socket, which have memory mapped access and a configuration option for enabling it. Generally speaking, I thought that having fine-grane configuration options would be preferable. cheers, Paolo -- Email.it, the professional e-mail, gratis per te: http://www.email.it/f Sponsor: Nuovi giochi per cellulare. Scarica e inizia la tua partita. * Clicca qui: http://adv.email.it/cgi-bin/foclick.cgi?mid=7519&d=18-2 - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-usb" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
