Greg KH wrote: > A "driver" is not an "application" as you tried to reference in your > prior quotes. I think your treating what the learned Professors said to literally.
> It is a tiny portion of the whole kernel, The Copyright Act draws no such a distinction. > and as such, > does fall under the derivative works portion when it is run within the > Linux kernel. > Section 0 of GPL: The act of running the Program is not restricted. > Again, see the Samba decisions that have happened in the past when > companies have tried to add modules to it that are not under the GPL. > They have failed every single time, so there is a lot of precedent for > this kind of thing. > I'd like to, but I've searched and searched and can't find them. Some pointers, maybe a search term, would be useful. > This is going to be my last response on this thread, Good idea. I've spent too much time on this already, so I think I'll join you. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-usb" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
