On Tuesday 08 January 2008, Karsten Wiese wrote: > Am Montag, 7. Januar 2008 schrieb David Brownell: > > > > Here's a better way, on top of $SUBJECT patch. > > Saves another four bytes too. ;) > > Doesn't work: > I patched -rc7 with > [patch 2.6.24-rc6] usb: ehci saves some memory in ISO transfer descriptors > + both $SUBJECT patches.
Hmm, I think I'll postpone the "save more memory" stuff and focus on the other, safer, bits. Like: http://marc.info/?l=linux-usb&m=119908051823730 ... your first "save memory" patch http://marc.info/?l=linux-usb&m=119969573929340 ... updating schedule scanning I think both those are ready to merge. So I'll do a version of http://marc.info/?l=linux-usb&m=119913406214488 ... delay recycling ISO descriptors that doesn't depend on $SUBJECT patch. That will address many (but not all) of the issues you noted. In particular it won't add any mechanism that would let you work with interdependent endpoint data queues. - Dave - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-usb" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
