On Mon, 7 Jan 2008 21:51:18 +0100, Oliver Neukum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I must admit that testing ub didn't occur to me. I will do so tomorrow. Ub > does not use a kernel thread, does it? I used to harp on the thread but I really shouldn't have. It is a part of the story, the other part is that ub uses small blocks by default. My idea was to split the difference between thread and no thread, but it didn't work out this way. So now I think that there's nothing fundamentally wrong with usb-storage, it's just more aggressive than ub. I was just curious about your test case. -- Pete - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-usb" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
