On Tue, Jul 01, 2025 at 12:25:32PM +0200, Christophe Leroy wrote: > Your patch below is simpler than what I proposed, but it keeps the static > branches so the overhead remains. > > I also proposed a change, it goes further by removing the static branch for > architectures that don't need it, see > https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/linuxppc-dev/cover/20250626153147.145312-1-snovit...@gmail.com/#3537388 > . Feedback welcome.
Yes, removing the static branches during compile time is of course even better.
