On Sun, Apr 27, 2025 at 12:49:36PM +0900, Hajime Tazaki wrote: > > Hello Lorenzo, > > On Fri, 25 Apr 2025 22:49:31 +0900, > Lorenzo Stoakes wrote: > > > It seemed this series died, which is a pity, i'd be very useful to have > > this functionality to aid in easily testing nommu in mm code. > > > > I know that I pushed back a little (or rather - wondering about the status > > of nommu in general) back in v2, however with it confirmed that nommu is > > required, this series becomes really quite important. > > > > This would need rebasing of course for a v8, but I wonder if there is any > > appetite for it or why this didn't go anywhere? > > > > In any case, if you are still interested in this Hajime (thanks so much for > > all your hard work on it!), just saying there are definitely users out > > there. > > I've been waiting for opinions from the um maintainers to the v7 > patchset, and am ready to send v8 series with rebasing the current > uml/next branch. > > I believe the v7 series is still in the patchwork queue so, I hope > it'll be reviewed soon. > > # thanks for the information that this feature is useful to test mm > code.
Thanks, appreciate the response. I would say send a v8 that's rebased to make life easier for maintainers :) if you already have it ready to go that is! I think at this stage that makes more sense, as gives the maintainers a chance to run locally + account for any recent changes etc. Thank you again for all your hard work on this! This could be super useful for us over in mm :) > > -- Hajime Cheers, Lorenzo
