On Tue, 2025-03-18 at 11:10 +0100, Miguel Ojeda wrote: > On Tue, Mar 18, 2025 at 9:07 AM David Gow <david...@google.com> wrote: > > > > Is there anything holding this up for the upcoming merge window? > > > > Miguel: I'm assuming you'd rather take this (and possibly [1] as well) > > via Rust, but if it goes in via the uml tree, that'd be fine by me, > > too. > > We try to get arch maintainers involved (and everyone else, of > course), i.e. it is up to them. But I see only the list was Cc'd, not > them directly, for some reason -- doing it here.
The list is fine, but the patch wasn't even CC'ed there, so we don't have it in our patchwork: https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/linux-um/list/ > Ideally, maintainers get involved and pick their own Rust-related > patches, but I can also do so with an Acked-by from them, which would > be nice. I was just picking up um patches, but given that it was a series, and changes rust/ rather than arch/um/, I think it's probably better if you do it, so: Acked-by: Johannes Berg <johan...@sipsolutions.net> johannes
