Re: [PATCH] um: Abandon the _PAGE_NEWPROT bit

[Johannes Berg]

Hi Tiwei,

So kind of a nit, but if the resulting code looks like this:

> @@ -184,17 +172,14 @@ static inline pte_t pte_wrprotect(pte_t pte)
>  {
>       if (likely(pte_get_bits(pte, _PAGE_RW)))
>               pte_clear_bits(pte, _PAGE_RW);
>       return pte;
>  }

then the if really isn't needed?

Same for all the others, I guess.

johannes