On 2024/9/13 02:51, Richard Weinberger wrote:
> ----- Ursprüngliche Mail -----
>> Von: "Tiwei Bie" <tiwei....@antgroup.com>
>> An: "richard" <rich...@nod.at>, "anton ivanov"
>> <anton.iva...@cambridgegreys.com>, "Johannes Berg"
>> <johan...@sipsolutions.net>
>> CC: "linux-um" <linux-um@lists.infradead.org>, "linux-kernel"
>> <linux-ker...@vger.kernel.org>, "Tiwei Bie"
>> <tiwei....@antgroup.com>
>> Gesendet: Mittwoch, 28. August 2024 15:51:40
>> Betreff: [PATCH] um: Fix the return value of elf_core_copy_task_fpregs
>
>> This function is expected to return a boolean value, which should be
>> true on success and false on failure.
>>
>> Fixes: d1254b12c93e ("uml: fix x86_64 core dump crash")
>> Signed-off-by: Tiwei Bie <tiwei....@antgroup.com>
>> ---
>> arch/um/kernel/process.c | 3 ++-
>> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/um/kernel/process.c b/arch/um/kernel/process.c
>> index be2856af6d4c..3cc2b663aa78 100644
>> --- a/arch/um/kernel/process.c
>> +++ b/arch/um/kernel/process.c
>> @@ -291,7 +291,8 @@ unsigned long __get_wchan(struct task_struct *p)
>> int elf_core_copy_task_fpregs(struct task_struct *t, elf_fpregset_t *fpu)
>> {
>> int cpu = current_thread_info()->cpu;
>> + int pid = userspace_pid[cpu];
>>
>> - return save_i387_registers(userspace_pid[cpu], (unsigned long *) fpu);
>> + return save_i387_registers(pid, (unsigned long *) fpu) == 0;
>
> Why a new local variable?
Thanks for the review! The new variable isn't necessary for the fix.
Will drop it to make the fix more straightforward.
Regards,
Tiwei
