On Tue, 05 Mar 2024, Tiwei Bie <tiwei....@antgroup.com> wrote: > Thanks for raising this topic! > > Indeed. To make it easier to review, the current series only addressed > the -Wmissing-prototypes warnings that can be fixed straightforwardly (e.g. > by turning into static functions or including missing headers). The remaining > -Wmissing-prototypes warnings mainly fall into the following categories: > > - Symbols defined and used in os-Linux/; > - Symbols defined in os-Linux/, but declared in kernel headers; > - Symbols defined in individual files and not called explicitly; > > My plan was to fix the remaining warnings in followup series. Ultimately, > I wish we can let cc treat -Wmissing-prototypes warnings as errors.
Yay! That's good to hear. If you want to get build testing from our CI, using our configs, please just Cc: intel...@lists.freedesktop.org when sending the patches. You'll get the results in reply. Thanks, Jani. -- Jani Nikula, Intel
