On Fri, 2023-09-22 at 13:16 +0200, Johannes Berg wrote: > Note that this fixes what seems like an issue - we look > at current->mm when we copy, but that doesn't seem right > in the case of clone() without copying the MM. This is > probably saved by the forced flush later right now. >
After finding flush_thread(), that's clearly not true ;-) But that basically leaves the only thing slower here the start_userspace() itself, i.e. basically userspace_tramp()? johannes _______________________________________________ linux-um mailing list linux-um@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-um
