On Sun, Aug 20, 2023 at 6:15 AM Richard Weinberger <rich...@nod.at> wrote: > > ----- Ursprüngliche Mail ----- > > Von: "masahiroy" <masahi...@kernel.org> > > We rely on 'uname -s' returning 'Linux' because there are os-Linux/ > > directories, but no other os-*/. > > > > Supporting a non-Linux host is unlikely to happen. > > > > Let's hard-code 'Linux'. > > While I agree that a non-Linux version is unlikely I'd like to > know why we can't keep the uname -s check? > I guess to avoid unnecessary command execution?
Just because 'uname -s' is meaningless. Just build 'Linux' ones irrespective of the host platform. If it works, it works. If not, it does not work. -- Best Regards Masahiro Yamada _______________________________________________ linux-um mailing list linux-um@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-um
