On Thu, Jun 08, 2023 at 10:41:29AM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > On Wed, Jun 07, 2023 at 12:00:57AM +0100, Phillip Potter wrote: > > Looks good, thanks. > > > > Signed-off-by: Phillip Potter <p...@philpotter.co.uk> > > Hmm, these signoffs don't really make sense here. Were they intended > as Reviewed-bys? > Hi Christoph,
Yes indeed - I was under the impression it was appropriate for a maintainer to signal their approval of a patch to maintained code using a Signed-off-by tag due to their involvement in the submission process? Apologies if I've got this wrong, happy to send Reviewed-bys by all means. Regards, Phil _______________________________________________ linux-um mailing list linux-um@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-um
