>Hm, in the !CONFIG_GENERIC_SMP_IDLE_THREAD case, idle_thread_get() will
>have returned NULL. Won't these then crash?
>
>Admittedly that seems to be *only* for UM, as all other architectures
>with SMP seem to set CONFIG_GENERIC_SMP_IDLE_THREAD.

UM doesn't even have SMP, so maybe CONFIG_GENERIC_SMP_IDLE_THREAD can just be 
removed?

johannes 
-- 
Sent from my phone. 

_______________________________________________
linux-um mailing list
linux-um@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-um

Reply via email to