Quoting David Gow (2023-03-02 23:14:55) > On Thu, 2 Mar 2023 at 09:38, Stephen Boyd <sb...@kernel.org> wrote: > > > > Document the linux,kunit board compatible string. This board is loaded > > into the Linux kernel when KUnit is testing devicetree dependent code. > > As with the series as a whole, this might need to change a little bit > if we want to either use devicetree overlays and/or other > architectures. > > That being said, I'm okay with having this until then: the only real > topic for bikeshedding is the name. > - Is KUnit best as a board name, or part of the vendor name? > - Do we want to include the architecture in the name? > Should it be "linux,kunit", "linux-kunit,uml", "linux,kunit-uml", etc?
I think I will drop this patch. I have overlays working. I hijacked of_core_init() to load the testcase data from drivers/of/unittest-data and made a container node for kunit overlays to apply to. _______________________________________________ linux-um mailing list linux-um@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-um
