On Fri, 17 Feb 2023 15:56:43 -0600 Glenn Washburn <developm...@efficientek.com> wrote:
> On Fri, 17 Feb 2023 11:14:01 +0100 > Geert Uytterhoeven <ge...@linux-m68k.org> wrote: > > > Hi Andrew, > > > > On Fri, Feb 17, 2023 at 12:33 AM Andrew Morton > > <a...@linux-foundation.org> wrote: > > > On Thu, 16 Feb 2023 23:54:38 +0100 (CET) Richard Weinberger > > > <rich...@nod.at> wrote: > > > > ----- Ursprüngliche Mail ----- > > > > > Von: "Andrew Morton" <a...@linux-foundation.org> > > > > > Thanks, but I'm not subscribed to linux-um and my usual > > > > > get-it-from-lkml didn't work. > > > > > > > > > > Could we please have a resend, with a cc to linux-kernel? > > > > > > > > You can also get the patches in mbox format from: > > > > https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/linux-um/list/?series=342212 > > > > And from there, you can get the Message-IDs, and use lore: > > https://lore.kernel.org/r/683d10e752cd4852ac62ef3cc3e9a6972a017bdf.1676532759.git.developm...@efficientek.com > > or b4: > > b4 mbox > > 683d10e752cd4852ac62ef3cc3e9a6972a017bdf.1676532759.git.developm...@efficientek.com > > b4 am > > 683d10e752cd4852ac62ef3cc3e9a6972a017bdf.1676532759.git.developm...@efficientek.com > > > > > Thanks, but.. > > > > > > - Can't do reply-to-all if I have comments > > > - Can't collect people's followup acks and review comments > > > - No Link tag > > Ok, so do I need to resend after all? Yes please. Call it v2, add any acks and reviewed-bys. > And anther point in need of > clarification, regardless of subsystem or area of source, when sending > patches, should I always cc to linux-kernel? I think it's best. That's pretty much the only purpose lkml serves now :( _______________________________________________ linux-um mailing list linux-um@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-um
