On Thu, Sep 8, 2022 at 2:56 PM Johannes Berg <johan...@sipsolutions.net> wrote:
> On Thu, 2022-09-08 at 20:54 +0800, wangjianli wrote:
> > Delete the redundant word 'in'.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: wangjianli <wangjia...@cdjrlc.com>
> > ---
> > arch/um/kernel/physmem.c | 2 +-
> > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/arch/um/kernel/physmem.c b/arch/um/kernel/physmem.c
> > index e7c7b53a1435..91485119ae67 100644
> > --- a/arch/um/kernel/physmem.c
> > +++ b/arch/um/kernel/physmem.c
> > @@ -169,7 +169,7 @@ __uml_setup("iomem=", parse_iomem,
> > );
> >
> > /*
> > - * This list is constructed in parse_iomem and addresses filled in in
> > + * This list is constructed in parse_iomem and addresses filled in
> > * setup_iomem, both of which run during early boot. Afterwards, it's
> >
> Fine, I guess, but honestly - that sentence doesn't parse well either
Not fine, the repeated "in" is correct.
Q: "Where are addresses filled in?"
A: "In setup_iomem".
> way. Might be worth addressing that at the same time...
addresses are filled in?
General note: please stop submitting these patches for auto-detected
repeated words. There are too many false positives.
Thanks!
Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
Geert
--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- ge...@linux-m68k.org
In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
-- Linus Torvalds
_______________________________________________
linux-um mailing list
linux-um@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-um
