On Fri, 1 Jul 2022 16:55:05 +0800, Jason Wang <jasow...@redhat.com> wrote:
>
> 在 2022/6/29 14:56, Xuan Zhuo 写道:
> > Separate the logic of creating desc_state, desc_extra, and subsequent
> > patches will call it independently.
> >
> > Since only the structure vring is passed into __vring_new_virtqueue(),
> > when creating the function vring_alloc_state_extra_split(), we prefer to
> > use vring_virtqueue_split as a parameter, and it will be more convenient
> > to pass vring_virtqueue_split to some subsequent functions.
> >
> > So a new vring_virtqueue_split variable is added in
> > __vring_new_virtqueue().
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Xuan Zhuo <xuanz...@linux.alibaba.com>
> > ---
> >   drivers/virtio/virtio_ring.c | 58 +++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------
> >   1 file changed, 40 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/virtio/virtio_ring.c b/drivers/virtio/virtio_ring.c
> > index a9ceb9c16c54..cedd340d6db7 100644
> > --- a/drivers/virtio/virtio_ring.c
> > +++ b/drivers/virtio/virtio_ring.c
> > @@ -204,6 +204,7 @@ struct vring_virtqueue {
> >   #endif
> >   };
> >
> > +static struct vring_desc_extra *vring_alloc_desc_extra(unsigned int num);
> >
> >   /*
> >    * Helpers.
> > @@ -939,6 +940,32 @@ static void *virtqueue_detach_unused_buf_split(struct 
> > virtqueue *_vq)
> >     return NULL;
> >   }
> >
> > +static int vring_alloc_state_extra_split(struct vring_virtqueue_split 
> > *vring)
> > +{
> > +   struct vring_desc_state_split *state;
> > +   struct vring_desc_extra *extra;
> > +   u32 num = vring->vring.num;
> > +
> > +   state = kmalloc_array(num, sizeof(struct vring_desc_state_split), 
> > GFP_KERNEL);
> > +   if (!state)
> > +           goto err_state;
> > +
> > +   extra = vring_alloc_desc_extra(num);
> > +   if (!extra)
> > +           goto err_extra;
> > +
> > +   memset(state, 0, num * sizeof(struct vring_desc_state_split));
> > +
> > +   vring->desc_state = state;
> > +   vring->desc_extra = extra;
> > +   return 0;
> > +
> > +err_extra:
> > +   kfree(state);
> > +err_state:
> > +   return -ENOMEM;
> > +}
> > +
> >   static void vring_free_split(struct vring_virtqueue_split *vring,
> >                          struct virtio_device *vdev)
> >   {
> > @@ -2224,7 +2251,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(vring_interrupt);
> >
> >   /* Only available for split ring */
> >   struct virtqueue *__vring_new_virtqueue(unsigned int index,
> > -                                   struct vring vring,
> > +                                   struct vring _vring,
> >                                     struct virtio_device *vdev,
> >                                     bool weak_barriers,
> >                                     bool context,
> > @@ -2232,7 +2259,9 @@ struct virtqueue *__vring_new_virtqueue(unsigned int 
> > index,
> >                                     void (*callback)(struct virtqueue *),
> >                                     const char *name)
> >   {
> > +   struct vring_virtqueue_split vring = {};
>
>
> Nit: to reduce the change-set, let's use vring_split here?

Will fix.

Thanks.


>
> Other looks good.
>
> Thanks
>
>
> >     struct vring_virtqueue *vq;
> > +   int err;
> >
> >     if (virtio_has_feature(vdev, VIRTIO_F_RING_PACKED))
> >             return NULL;
> > @@ -2261,7 +2290,7 @@ struct virtqueue *__vring_new_virtqueue(unsigned int 
> > index,
> >     vq->split.queue_dma_addr = 0;
> >     vq->split.queue_size_in_bytes = 0;
> >
> > -   vq->split.vring = vring;
> > +   vq->split.vring = _vring;
> >     vq->split.avail_flags_shadow = 0;
> >     vq->split.avail_idx_shadow = 0;
> >
> > @@ -2273,30 +2302,23 @@ struct virtqueue *__vring_new_virtqueue(unsigned 
> > int index,
> >                                     vq->split.avail_flags_shadow);
> >     }
> >
> > -   vq->split.desc_state = kmalloc_array(vring.num,
> > -                   sizeof(struct vring_desc_state_split), GFP_KERNEL);
> > -   if (!vq->split.desc_state)
> > -           goto err_state;
> > +   vring.vring = _vring;
> >
> > -   vq->split.desc_extra = vring_alloc_desc_extra(vring.num);
> > -   if (!vq->split.desc_extra)
> > -           goto err_extra;
> > +   err = vring_alloc_state_extra_split(&vring);
> > +   if (err) {
> > +           kfree(vq);
> > +           return NULL;
> > +   }
> >
> > -   memset(vq->split.desc_state, 0, vring.num *
> > -                   sizeof(struct vring_desc_state_split));
> > +   vq->split.desc_state = vring.desc_state;
> > +   vq->split.desc_extra = vring.desc_extra;
> >
> > -   virtqueue_init(vq, vq->split.vring.num);
> > +   virtqueue_init(vq, vring.vring.num);
> >
> >     spin_lock(&vdev->vqs_list_lock);
> >     list_add_tail(&vq->vq.list, &vdev->vqs);
> >     spin_unlock(&vdev->vqs_list_lock);
> >     return &vq->vq;
> > -
> > -err_extra:
> > -   kfree(vq->split.desc_state);
> > -err_state:
> > -   kfree(vq);
> > -   return NULL;
> >   }
> >   EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(__vring_new_virtqueue);
> >
>

_______________________________________________
linux-um mailing list
linux-um@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-um

Reply via email to