On Tue, Apr 26, 2022 at 3:52 PM Eric W. Biederman <ebied...@xmission.com> wrote:
>
> xtensa is the last user of the PT_SINGLESTEP flag.  Changing tsk->ptrace in
> user_enable_single_step and user_disable_single_step without locking could
> potentiallly cause problems.
>
> So use a thread info flag instead of a flag in tsk->ptrace.  Use 
> TIF_SINGLESTEP
> that xtensa already had defined but unused.
>
> Remove the definitions of PT_SINGLESTEP and PT_BLOCKSTEP as they have no more 
> users.
>
> Signed-off-by: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebied...@xmission.com>
> ---
>  arch/xtensa/kernel/ptrace.c | 4 ++--
>  arch/xtensa/kernel/signal.c | 4 ++--
>  include/linux/ptrace.h      | 6 ------
>  3 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)

Acked-by: Max Filippov <jcmvb...@gmail.com>

-- 
Thanks.
-- Max

_______________________________________________
linux-um mailing list
linux-um@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-um

Reply via email to