On Tue, Apr 26, 2022 at 3:52 PM Eric W. Biederman <ebied...@xmission.com> wrote: > > xtensa is the last user of the PT_SINGLESTEP flag. Changing tsk->ptrace in > user_enable_single_step and user_disable_single_step without locking could > potentiallly cause problems. > > So use a thread info flag instead of a flag in tsk->ptrace. Use > TIF_SINGLESTEP > that xtensa already had defined but unused. > > Remove the definitions of PT_SINGLESTEP and PT_BLOCKSTEP as they have no more > users. > > Signed-off-by: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebied...@xmission.com> > --- > arch/xtensa/kernel/ptrace.c | 4 ++-- > arch/xtensa/kernel/signal.c | 4 ++-- > include/linux/ptrace.h | 6 ------ > 3 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
Acked-by: Max Filippov <jcmvb...@gmail.com> -- Thanks. -- Max _______________________________________________ linux-um mailing list linux-um@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-um