On Mon, Apr 04 2022 at 10:37, Johannes Berg wrote: > On Mon, 2022-04-04 at 10:32 +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote: >> --- a/kernel/time/timer.c >> +++ b/kernel/time/timer.c >> @@ -1724,9 +1724,8 @@ static inline void __run_timers(struct t >> /* >> * The only possible reason for not finding any expired >> * timer at this clk is that all matching timers have been >> - * dequeued. >> + * dequeued or no timer has been ever queued. >> */ >> - WARN_ON_ONCE(!levels && !base->next_expiry_recalc); >> > > So I'm pretty sure we don't even need to test a patch simply removing > the WARN_ON_ONCE() since the entire problem Vincent reported was hitting > the WARN_ON_ONCE :)
:) > (And I'm pretty sure I did at some point test some additional condition > inside it) > > Are you going to merge that patch? Let me write a coherent changelog. _______________________________________________ linux-um mailing list linux-um@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-um
