On Thu, 27 Aug 2026 14:27:44 +0200 Jérémy Jean <[email protected]> wrote:
> Thanks for this. I thought that my previous version was okay > so that it was not required to read the details of > user_event_mm_alloc() to get convinced whether user_event_mm is > accessed or not, but it's true that in the end, this is not > required. Your fix is simpler. Do you want me to send a v3 > with that simplification and the same changelog as in the v2? Yes, please send a v3. Thanks, -- Steve
