From: Hui Zhu <[email protected]>

Two UAF scenarios exist in bpf_trampoline_multi_detach() error paths:

1. If __bpf_trampoline_unlink_prog() fails, cur_image == old_image and
   ftrace still points to it, but bpf_trampoline_multi_attach_free()
   unconditionally frees old_image. Fix: only free old_image when it
   differs from cur_image.

2. If the batch update_ftrace_direct_del/mod() fails, ftrace still
   points to old_image, but _free() frees it. Fix: use rollback
   (restores cur_image = old_image) instead of _free() for affected
   mnodes.

Rollback keeps the image alive but the caller still frees the prog
whose call is baked into it. Pin the prog on old_image via a new
pinned_prog field in struct bpf_tramp_image (released in
bpf_tramp_image_free()).

bpf_trampoline_put() must not free a trampoline whose cur_image was
left behind by rollback -- ftrace may still call into it. Leak the
trampoline instead (it's already unlinked from lookup tables).

pinned_prog is a single pointer: if multiple progs need pinning on the
same image (rare), only the last is tracked and earlier refs are leaked
(not a UAF). This is an intentional trade-off.

Also make bpf_trampoline_multi_detach() return void since callers
cannot usefully react to failures.

Fixes: aef4dfa790b2 ("bpf: Add bpf_trampoline_multi_attach/detach functions")
Signed-off-by: Hui Zhu <[email protected]>
---
 include/linux/bpf.h      |  20 +++++--
 kernel/bpf/trampoline.c  | 112 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----
 kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c |   2 +-
 3 files changed, 118 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)

diff --git a/include/linux/bpf.h b/include/linux/bpf.h
index 73bacfc6444d..cd32c6f54eeb 100644
--- a/include/linux/bpf.h
+++ b/include/linux/bpf.h
@@ -1372,6 +1372,17 @@ struct bpf_tramp_image {
                struct rcu_head rcu;
                struct work_struct work;
        };
+       /*
+        * Extra reference on the bpf_prog whose call is baked into this
+        * image's machine code, held only when a required ftrace
+        * direct-call update failed while retiring/replacing this image
+        * (see bpf_trampoline_multi_attach()/_detach() in trampoline.c).
+        * ftrace may still be directing calls into this image, so neither
+        * the image nor the pinned prog can be freed until a later,
+        * successful ftrace update proves this image is no longer in use.
+        * Released in bpf_tramp_image_free() alongside the image itself.
+        */
+       struct bpf_prog *pinned_prog;
 };
 
 struct bpf_trampoline {
@@ -1518,8 +1529,8 @@ int arch_prepare_bpf_dispatcher(void *image, void *buf, 
s64 *funcs, int num_func
 
 int bpf_trampoline_multi_attach(struct bpf_prog *prog, u32 *ids,
                                struct bpf_tracing_multi_link *link);
-int bpf_trampoline_multi_detach(struct bpf_prog *prog,
-                               struct bpf_tracing_multi_link *link);
+void bpf_trampoline_multi_detach(struct bpf_prog *prog,
+                                struct bpf_tracing_multi_link *link);
 void bpf_trampoline_set_flags(struct bpf_trampoline *tr, u32 flags);
 
 /*
@@ -1639,10 +1650,9 @@ static inline int bpf_trampoline_multi_attach(struct 
bpf_prog *prog, u32 *ids,
 {
        return -ENOTSUPP;
 }
-static inline int bpf_trampoline_multi_detach(struct bpf_prog *prog,
-                                             struct bpf_tracing_multi_link 
*link)
+static inline void bpf_trampoline_multi_detach(struct bpf_prog *prog,
+                                              struct bpf_tracing_multi_link 
*link)
 {
-       return -ENOTSUPP;
 }
 static inline void bpf_trampoline_set_flags(struct bpf_trampoline *tr, u32 
flags) {}
 #endif
diff --git a/kernel/bpf/trampoline.c b/kernel/bpf/trampoline.c
index ed7999ad6c66..c08d1a09e638 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/trampoline.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/trampoline.c
@@ -535,6 +535,14 @@ static void bpf_tramp_image_free(struct bpf_tramp_image 
*im)
        arch_free_bpf_trampoline(im->image, im->size);
        bpf_jit_uncharge_modmem(im->size);
        percpu_ref_exit(&im->pcref);
+       /*
+        * This image is confirmed no longer reachable from ftrace (that's
+        * why we're freeing it), so it's now safe to drop the reference we
+        * pinned on its behalf while it may have still been live - see
+        * bpf_trampoline_multi_attach()/_detach().
+        */
+       if (im->pinned_prog)
+               bpf_prog_put(im->pinned_prog);
        kfree_rcu(im, rcu);
 }
 
@@ -1216,6 +1224,28 @@ void bpf_trampoline_put(struct bpf_trampoline *tr)
         */
        hlist_del(&tr->hlist_key);
        hlist_del(&tr->hlist_ip);
+
+       /*
+        * tr->cur_image should already be NULL here. A non-NULL value means
+        * bpf_trampoline_multi_attach_rollback() left an image behind
+        * because a required ftrace direct-call update failed (see
+        * bpf_trampoline_multi_detach()), so ftrace may still be calling
+        * into it - and, in turn, into the bpf_prog pinned in
+        * tr->cur_image->pinned_prog. We have no reliable way to confirm
+        * ftrace has since stopped referencing it, so freeing
+        * tr->cur_image (and dropping the pinned prog's reference) here
+        * would risk a use-after-free.
+        *
+        * tr has just been unlinked from the lookup tables above, so any
+        * future attach to this function allocates a fresh trampoline;
+        * this one, its stuck image, and the pinned prog reference are
+        * deliberately leaked instead of freed. This is rare (it only
+        * happens after a genuine ftrace direct-call update failure) and
+        * bounded (at most one image), so it is far preferable to a UAF.
+        */
+       if (WARN_ON_ONCE(tr->cur_image))
+               goto out;
+
        direct_ops_free(tr);
        kfree(tr);
 out:
@@ -1595,7 +1625,18 @@ static void bpf_trampoline_multi_attach_init(struct 
bpf_trampoline *tr)
 
 static void bpf_trampoline_multi_attach_free(struct bpf_trampoline *tr)
 {
-       if (tr->multi_attach.old_image)
+       /*
+        * Only free old_image if it is no longer the active image.
+        * When bpf_trampoline_update() fails before modify_fentry_multi()/
+        * unregister_fentry_multi() is called, cur_image is unchanged
+        * (cur_image == old_image) and ftrace still points to it. Freeing
+        * it would cause a UAF when ftrace calls into the freed memory.
+        * On success, cur_image is either a new image or NULL, so
+        * old_image != cur_image correctly identifies a stale image that
+        * is safe to free.
+        */
+       if (tr->multi_attach.old_image &&
+           tr->multi_attach.old_image != tr->cur_image)
                bpf_tramp_image_put(tr->multi_attach.old_image);
 
        tr->multi_attach.old_image = NULL;
@@ -1719,11 +1760,11 @@ int bpf_trampoline_multi_attach(struct bpf_prog *prog, 
u32 *ids,
        return err;
 }
 
-int bpf_trampoline_multi_detach(struct bpf_prog *prog, struct 
bpf_tracing_multi_link *link)
+void bpf_trampoline_multi_detach(struct bpf_prog *prog, struct 
bpf_tracing_multi_link *link)
 {
        struct bpf_tracing_multi_data *data = &link->data;
        struct bpf_tracing_multi_node *mnode;
-       int i, err;
+       int i, err, err_unreg = 0, err_mod = 0;
 
        trampoline_lock_all();
 
@@ -1735,13 +1776,65 @@ int bpf_trampoline_multi_detach(struct bpf_prog *prog, 
struct bpf_tracing_multi_
                WARN_ONCE(err, "__bpf_trampoline_unlink_prog failed: %d\n", 
err);
        }
 
-       if (ftrace_hash_count(data->unreg))
-               WARN_ON_ONCE(update_ftrace_direct_del(&direct_ops, 
data->unreg));
-       if (ftrace_hash_count(data->modify))
-               WARN_ON_ONCE(update_ftrace_direct_mod(&direct_ops, 
data->modify, true));
+       if (ftrace_hash_count(data->unreg)) {
+               err_unreg = update_ftrace_direct_del(&direct_ops, data->unreg);
+               WARN_ON_ONCE(err_unreg);
+       }
+       if (ftrace_hash_count(data->modify)) {
+               err_mod = update_ftrace_direct_mod(&direct_ops, data->modify, 
true);
+               WARN_ON_ONCE(err_mod);
+       }
 
-       for_each_mnode(mnode, link)
-               bpf_trampoline_multi_attach_free(mnode->trampoline);
+       for_each_mnode(mnode, link) {
+               struct bpf_trampoline *tr = mnode->trampoline;
+
+               /* If the batch ftrace update failed for this mnode's path,
+                * ftrace still points to old_image. Use rollback to restore
+                * cur_image to old_image (putting the new cur_image if any)
+                * so the trampoline keeps the image ftrace is calling.
+                *
+                * A link only reaches detach after a successful attach, so
+                * tr->cur_image (captured above as old_image) is always
+                * non-NULL here; the NULL check only mirrors the one in
+                * bpf_trampoline_multi_attach_free()/_rollback()'s shared
+                * pattern and guards against tr->multi_attach being reused
+                * without a prior _init() call.
+                *
+                * This relies on update_ftrace_direct_del/mod being atomic:
+                * on failure, NO IPs in the hash are modified in ftrace (all
+                * validation/allocation happens before any ftrace record is
+                * touched). If this assumption is broken in the future (i.e.,
+                * partial success becomes possible), this rollback logic would
+                * need to be revisited.
+                *
+                * cur_image == NULL indicates the unreg path (total == 0);
+                * cur_image != NULL indicates the modify path (total > 0).
+                *
+                * Rollback alone only prevents freeing the trampoline image
+                * while ftrace may still branch into it; it does not keep
+                * the underlying bpf_prog alive, and the caller tears down
+                * link->prog once this function returns. So pin @prog (whose
+                * call is baked into old_image's machine code) on old_image
+                * before restoring it as cur_image: the pin is released once
+                * old_image is eventually retired for real by a later,
+                * successful update on this trampoline (see
+                * bpf_trampoline_multi_attach_free() and
+                * bpf_tramp_image_free()), or safely leaked alongside the
+                * image if the trampoline is torn down first instead (see
+                * bpf_trampoline_put()).
+                */
+               if (tr->multi_attach.old_image &&
+                   tr->multi_attach.old_image != tr->cur_image &&
+                   ((err_unreg && !tr->cur_image) ||
+                    (err_mod && tr->cur_image))) {
+                       WARN_ON_ONCE(tr->multi_attach.old_image->pinned_prog);
+                       bpf_prog_inc(prog);
+                       tr->multi_attach.old_image->pinned_prog = prog;
+                       bpf_trampoline_multi_attach_rollback(tr);
+               } else {
+                       bpf_trampoline_multi_attach_free(tr);
+               }
+       }
 
        trampoline_unlock_all();
 
@@ -1749,7 +1842,6 @@ int bpf_trampoline_multi_detach(struct bpf_prog *prog, 
struct bpf_tracing_multi_
                bpf_trampoline_put(mnode->trampoline);
 
        clear_tracing_multi_data(data);
-       return 0;
 }
 
 #undef for_each_mnode_cnt
diff --git a/kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c b/kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c
index 891897f8a1b3..29260951aa87 100644
--- a/kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c
+++ b/kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c
@@ -3687,7 +3687,7 @@ static void bpf_tracing_multi_link_release(struct 
bpf_link *link)
        struct bpf_tracing_multi_link *tr_link =
                container_of(link, struct bpf_tracing_multi_link, link);
 
-       WARN_ON_ONCE(bpf_trampoline_multi_detach(link->prog, tr_link));
+       bpf_trampoline_multi_detach(link->prog, tr_link);
 }
 
 static void bpf_tracing_multi_link_dealloc(struct bpf_link *link)
-- 
2.53.0


Reply via email to